![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/gapki.id\/en\/allies-en\/uploads\/2020\/09\/indonesian_eyes_palmoil_smallholder-1024x683.jpg?resize=815%2C544&ssl=1\")
<\/p>\nThe European Union (EU) occasionally implements policies that produce unintended, even harmful effects on historically marginalized populations. In January 2018, for example, the European Parliament – citing environmental concerns – banned palm oil for biofuels.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The European Commission approved this, ignoring the devastating impact the ban would have on millions of smallholder farmers.<\/p>\n
It should come as no surprise that major palm oil producers like Malaysia and Indonesia labelled this decision \u2018crop apartheid\u2019: it reanimated the exploitative, colonial origins of the industry.<\/p>\n
\u201cCOVID-19 has further increased economic insecurity in developing countries, leading many to conclude that the EU is dictating the rules of global trade without taking into account the world\u2019s poorest.\u201d<\/p>\n
In order to optimize the efforts to combat climate change, such massive discrepancies in how the EU and palm oil producers view the biofuel ban must be resolved. While smallholder farmers are responsible for significant percentages of palm oil production, they are overwhelmingly not responsible for catastrophic deforestation. Nevertheless, the marked decline in demand provoked by the pandemic, followed by the EU biofuel ban, presents these farmers with a survival crisis, made all the more severe considering the significance of palm oil.<\/p>\n
In Malaysia, conscientious oversight of the industry – including the equitable distribution of viable plots for smallholders – \u00a0has powered that country\u2019s development and altered the fortunes of millions. Malaysia has complemented such prudent policies with a commitment to the Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) scheme, which has realized the widespread adoption of sustainable standards across that country.<\/p>\n
In light of Malaysia\u2019s progress, it is easier to understand why it reacted strongly to the EU\u2019s biofuel ban, describing it as \u2018crop apartheid\u2019 and \u2018green colonialism\u2019. Despite undeniably positive intentions, the European Union\u2019s decision to apply sanctions to palm oil will cause immense hardship to huge numbers of economically precarious people of color and threatens to drive them back into poverty. Simultaneously, the ban effects a subtle protectionism, exempting European oil seed products such as rapeseed and sunflower, which require more land, water, and fertilizer than palm oil, from any kind of economic penalty.<\/p>\n
Unfortunately, palm oil is not the only example of EU environmentalism – no matter how well intended – that has sparked feelings of resentment in the Global South. We in Africa know this too well; the EU\u2019s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) provides domestic farmers \u20ac42 billion in annual subsidies, strengthening their ability to export at artificially low prices to the developing world.<\/p>\n
This gives European producers an unfair advantage in markets such as Africa, bankrupting local farmers as a result. COVID-19 has further increased economic insecurity in developing countries, leading many to conclude that the EU is dictating the rules of global trade without taking into account the world\u2019s poorest. As a result, farmers in the Global South are prioritizing survival over sustainability – but not by choice.<\/p>\n
Rather than penalizing the Global South for the demands of Western consumers, the EU should work towards a level playing field. This would mean the EU working with the Global South, rewarding real momentum towards full sustainability, such as the MSPO scheme, and also pursuing mutually supportive forms of production, cultivation, and consumption.<\/p>\n
The Global South is, after all, no less invested in saving the world than Europe. As a global environmental leader, the EU has the opportunity to show that its policies are not motivated by protectionism or bias, but by genuine environmental concerns.<\/p>\n
Done correctly, international trade can contribute to curbing global deforestation. However, there cannot be such exchanges if one party dictates to another. Otherwise, the EU will place on the Global South a burden it simply cannot shoulder. (*)<\/p>\n
This article was published as\u00a0part of the Sustainability First supplement by the Center for Sustainable Palm Oil Studies (CSPO).<\/em><\/p>\n Source: theparliamentmagazine.eu<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The European Union (EU) occasionally implements policies that produce unintended, even harmful effects on historically marginalized populations. In January 2018, for example, the European Parliament – citing environmental concerns – banned palm oil for biofuels.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":19043,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","neve_meta_reading_time":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[3708,3709],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20775","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-publication","category-recent-news"],"yoast_head":"\n